Bimodal Sediment Transport States

Evidence of, and a proposed explanation for, bimodal transport states in alluvial rivers

Gravel-bedded rivers organize their bankfull channel geometry and grain size such that shear stress is close to the threshold of motion. Sand-bedded rivers on the other hand typically maintain bankfull fluid stresses far in excess of threshold, a condition for which there is no satisfactory understanding. A fundamental question arises: Are bed-load (gravel-bedded) and suspension (sand-bedded) rivers two distinct equilibrium states, or do alluvial rivers exhibit a continuum of transport regimes as some have recently suggested? We address this question in two ways: (1) re-analysis of global channel geometry datasets, with consideration of the dependence of critical shear stress upon site-specific characteristics (e.g. slope and grain size); and (2) examination of a longitudinal river profile as it transits from gravel to sand-bedded. Data reveal that the transport state of alluvial river-bed sediments is bimodal, showing either near-threshold or suspension conditions, and that these regimes correspond to the respective bimodal peaks of gravel and sand that comprise natural river-bed sediments. Sand readily forms near-threshold channels in the laboratory and some field settings, however, indicating that another factor, such as bank cohesion, must be responsible for maintaining suspension channels. We hypothesize that alluvial rivers adjust their geometry to the threshold-limiting bed and bank material — which for gravel-bedded rivers is gravel, but for sand-bedded rivers is mud (if present) — and present tentative evidence for this idea.

Dunne, K. B. J. and Jerolmack, D. J.: Evidence of, and a proposed explanation for, bimodal transport states in alluvial rivers, Earth Surf. Dynam., 6, 583-594, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-6-583-2018, 2018.

 

Figure1
Schematic cross-section of a sand-bedded, alluvial river with different bed vs. bank material, under bankfull flood conditions. Here Wbf, Hbf, and S are bankfull width, bankfull depth and channel gradient at the cross-section, respectively. Cyan lines at surface illustrate horizontal stress profile across the channel. Red lines along channel bottom indicate toe of the river bank — i.e., the intersection of bed and bank material. Red line intersecting the cyan velocity profile indicates the threshold stress of the threshold-limiting material, illustrating that the bank toe is at threshold while Shields stress in the channel center is slightly in excess of threshold.
Figure3
Bankfull Shields stress as a function of stream gradient. Coarse-grained rivers exhibit low Shields stresses with a moderate dependence on slope that roughly follows but is offset from the slope-dependent relation of Lamb et al. (2008) for critical Shields stress (solid line). Fine-grained rivers cluster well in excess of the threshold of motion. River channels originating in sandy substrates found in natural (Devauchelle et al., 2011) or laboratory (Reitz et al., 2014) environments are shown to be in the Shields stress space typically populated by gravel-bedded rivers.
Figure11
Potential adjustment of river-bed shear stress to the threshold-limiting material for the global data. The rising line from left to right indicates expected critical shear stress determined from grain size based on the Shields curve fit of van Rijn (2016). Gravel-bed rivers generally fall along this line, but sandy rivers generally plot significantly above it. Flat line shows a reference critical shear stress for the middle of the range of sand-mud mixtures. Cyan line indicates the trace of the threshold-limiting stress. For rivers with bed sediment grain sizes smaller than about a millimeter, we expect bank material to be threshold limiting; for gravel-bed rivers, the bed is expected to be threshold limiting.